Earlier this week, NRL CEO David Gallop declared the competition might be expanded by two teams in time for 2015. Whoever decides who they might be will have no shortage of options, as there are six official bids to join the NRL at the moment. Below are my hastily-drawn conclusions based on some Internet searching.
Bid: Brisbane
Home ground: Suncorp Stadium
Capacity: 52,200
Website: http://www.battleforbrisbane.com.au/
Pros: Population, stadium availability, pool of potential feeder clubs, corporate support, sponsorship strength, local derby appeal, supporter base of rugby league fans.
Cons: Does south east Queensland really, really, really need another rugby league team?
Bottom line: Winning the media battle with declarations they wanted Bennett to coach and Sonny Bill Williams and Quade Cooper to play and Petero Civoniceva to come back north of the border. Most likely to get the nod given Brisbane is the new ‘home’ of rugby league in Australia.
Bid: WA Reds
Home ground: nib Stadium
Capacity: 20,000
Website: http://waredsrugbyleague.com.au/
Pros: Elite football in Perth was killed when the first incarnation of the Reds was strangled at birth at the end of the Super League war. To the Sandgroper’s credit, they have continued to plug away. According to the Reds, nearly half of all males in the Perth Metro area watch the NRL on TV and more than half in the 18-39 age groups. Furthermore, current levels of participation in rugby league in Perth is just over 10% of males in the Perth metro area aged over 18 years, currently playing or have played rugby league in to past 5 years
Cons: Two AFL teams. A Super Rugby franchise. A well-supported basketball outfit. An ambitious A-League club. Is there enough room in the most isolated city in the world for another professional sporting team?
Bottom line: The Sydney clubs would much prefer this option to say, the Central Coast, given it would mean no head-to-head competition for sponsors and spectators. Possibly the first franchise over the line.
Bid: Central Coast Bears
Home ground: Bluetounge Stadium, Gosford
Capacity: 20,059
Website: http://www.centralcoastbears.com.au/
Pros: Where to begin? Gosford is a part of rugby league’s ‘heartland’, but has been ignored since the disastrous Northern Eagles joint venture fell apart. Sure, Gosford hosts a handful of games of year, but that isn’t enough to satisfy the people of the Central Coast. Nor should it be. The A-League’s Mariners have been a screaming success up there because they are marketed as a team representing the Central Coast – a rugby league team doing the same would be twice as huge. North Sydney, reborn in Gosford, makes sense for the league as a whole.
Cons: Sydney clubs don’t want the competition. Plain and simple. That will be enough to sink the Bears. More’s the pity.
Bottom line: They should be the first in – to atone for the past and build for the future. It’s up to the soon-to-be-finalised independent commission – here’s hoping they see the light.
Bid: Central Queensland
Home ground: Yet-to-be-built stadium in Rockhampton
Capacity: 20,000
Website: http://www.cqnrlbid.com.au
Pros: The bid claims to have 30,000 members – indicating that there is a demand for a team. The fledgling franchise also has some pretty impressive corporate support behind it.
Cons: Central Queensland? Really? Rugby league is about tribalism, not a bunch of second rate towns banding together and claiming they should have a NRL club. How can the club legitimately represent such a far-flung area effectively? Yes, both sides of politics have declared they would fund a stadium, but it still has to be built.
Bottom line: There will be a new team in Queensland but the second Brisbane club looks a more attractive option than the CQ’s.
Bid: PNG
Home ground: Lloyd Robson Oval, Port Moresby
Capacity: 18,000
Website: http://www.pngnrlbid.com/
Pros: The world’s most passionate rugby league supporting nation? The only country where the greatest game of all can truly be called the national sport? A sure-fire way to take elite footy somewhere it hasn’t been before? The heart and soul of the thing is fine. PNG probably does deserve a team, and as Gallop once said, it’s a matter of “when, not if”.
Cons: PNG. Social upheaval, corruption, the third world and all the things that come with that. Until recently, the bid and the PNG governing body didn’t see eye-to-eye. Also, I don’t know that Foxtel or Channel 9 really care about viewers on the other side of the Torres Strait.
Bottom line: Like Gallop said, not if but when … but not right now.
Bid: Ipswich Jets
Home ground: Suncorp Stadium
Capacity: 52,200
Website: http://www.ipswichjets.com.au/#
Pros: Strong rugby league area. Good population base. Possibility of a Broncos derby. Another tenant for Suncorp until the Jets get their own home in order.
Cons: Why go to Ipswich when there is a bid that wants to take the fight to the Broncos, in the state capital?
Bottom line: I see these guys missing out.
Other bids
Franchise: Logan
Home ground: Suncorp Stadium
Capacity: 52,200
Website: http://www.logannrlbid.com/index.php?p=1_1
Pros: They had an info evening … in October 2009.
Cons: Possibly dead in the water.
Bottom line: Dead in the water.
Franchise: Western Corridor
Home ground: Suncorp Stadium
Capacity: 52,200
Website: http://westerncorridornrlbid.com.au//
Pros: Claims updates are to come.
Cons: Updates haven’t come yet.
Bottom line: PNG seem more serious than these guys.
Bid: Southern Orcas
Home Ground: Westpac Stadium, Wellington, New Zealand
Capacity: 36,000
Website: N/A
Pros: Increase league’s footprint in the Shaky Isles?
Cons: Rugby union is king in Wellington.
Bottom line: Haven’t heard enough from these guys.